Dear Therapist,
I have a situation with my brother-in-law. My husband and I have been married for 25 years, and his brother has been mostly single until recently. Because their parents are no longer alive, I have always made a point to include my brother-in-law for every holiday and have also included any girlfriend he has had at the time. He has come to my parents’ house out West, our vacation home down South, and our home here in the East. All he has been required to do is show up and take part. He has never had to cook, plan, or prepare anything.
Right before the pandemic, he met a very nice woman who has a son the same age as mine. But he has made no effort to invite us to spend time with them. I just assumed that he was busy with his new family and gave him space. But now I think that we were just a placeholder until he had what he considered a family of his own. I feel very used.
Thanksgiving is coming up, and I am honestly tired of creating great holidays only for him to show up, then leave—and not even consider inviting us or my kids to anything in return. After 25 years, I should have seen the pattern sooner, but I always wanted to be the kinder person, especially since he has struggled with anxiety.
A recent example of his behavior is a family dinner we were invited to that we didn’t realize he was invited to as well. He knew for weeks about it but waited until the night before to ask my husband if he and his girlfriend could stay at our house—he lives 45 minutes away. My husband said to call and ask me, because I would have to prepare the room. He didn’t call, then backed out of going to the dinner at the last minute. In the past, he has invited people out to dinner near our home and stayed with us—but only for the night, and not to take us out to dinner. I feel so stupid that I always agreed to that.
Could you please guide me on whether I should invite him and his girlfriend and her son for Thanksgiving this year?
Sincerely,
Anonymous
Dear Anonymous,
For many of us, the holidays wouldn’t be the holidays without some family tension, so you’re certainly not alone. In a way that will probably sound familiar to you, people tend not to deal with their family issues until they’re facing an upcoming holiday gathering—at which point they decide that now would be a good time to remedy those overdue frustrations.
Unfortunately, many of these holiday-season solutions create new problems—such as hurt feelings and misunderstandings—without resolving the underlying dynamic. So let’s take a closer look at what’s going on here and what might be a longer-term solution than simply not inviting your brother-in-law to this year’s Thanksgiving.
First, consider that family members tend to construct stories about one another—you’re the favorite sibling; you’re the critical one; you’re too sensitive and can’t take a joke. It sounds like your story goes like this: Your brother-in-law is selfish, you’ve been overly generous, and you’re justifiably resentful. As a result, you’re angry at your brother-in-law for not reciprocating your invitations and also at yourself for not having “seen the pattern sooner.”
But what if the pattern isn’t that you’ve been overly generous and that your brother-in-law is selfish? What if, instead, the pattern is that when you issue an invitation to a meal or offer to let him stay overnight at your house, there’s a contract in your mind that your brother-in-law isn’t aware of—and that you haven’t shared?
You say, for instance, that when it comes to the holidays, he “has never had to cook, plan, or prepare anything.” But the reality is, neither have you. No one has forced you to do any of this; you’ve chosen to celebrate the holidays a certain way because you enjoy spending the holidays that way. For your brother-in-law, the contract looks like this: Our parents are deceased, my brother’s family invites me to spend the holidays with them, I accept the invitation, and we have a nice time. That’s our family tradition. For you, however, the invitation is more than a request for someone’s company; it’s a quid pro quo: I’ll invite you to celebrate the holidays with us, and I expect you to pitch in with cooking, cleaning, and planning; invite us to your home; and/or take us out to dinner instead of simply enjoying yourself.
The problem with unspoken contracts is people end up blaming others for their own lack of communication. At the same time, you seem to not be considering that there might be reasons other than selfishness for someone to not offer to host the holidays or invite people to dinner. Many people don’t know how to entertain or actively dislike it, feel uncomfortable having others in their private homes, live in too small a place, or lack the necessary resources. Some adults who have spent a lot of their life single, as seems to be the case with your brother-in-law, might not have much experience hosting or feel lonely hosting by themselves.
You also mention that he struggles with anxiety, which might be another reason he doesn’t initiate invitations—that anxiety may be why he waited until the night before the family dinner to ask his brother if he could stay at your house, didn’t call you as his brother instructed, and then bailed on the dinner altogether. And perhaps when he had dinner near your home, he stayed for only one night because he has picked up on your resentment and worries that he’s a burden. Family roles can also play into these dynamics. If your husband is the older brother or was considered the more “together” or “mature” one, it might feel natural to your brother-in-law to be the more passive of the two. Family roles from childhood persist even after the individuals grow up.
Relatedly, given that this is your husband’s brother and not yours, I wonder why you never mention your husband’s view of the situation in your letter. Would he feel comfortable not spending Thanksgiving with his brother, or would he miss his brother’s company? Does your husband “cook, plan, or prepare anything” for the holidays, or does it all fall to you? Is there a reason he couldn’t “prepare the room” for his brother to stay in after the family dinner? Does your husband express appreciation for the work you do to mark these occasions? I’m asking these questions because it’s possible that some of your resentment toward your brother-in-law is misdirected, and that you need to work through some things with your husband first.
All of this is to say that it’s time to communicate openly about what you need, rather than passive aggressively disinviting your brother-in-law from Thanksgiving. Instead of punishing others for your own lack of boundaries, go ahead and clarify your limits. If you feel burdened by hosting, enlist your husband’s help with the cooking and planning. You can also assign your family members specific dishes to either make or pick up ready-made at the store, or ask for their help with preparation and cleanup. You can even order a precooked meal and ask for financial contributions if the costs are high. If you simply don’t want to host anymore, then don’t: Suggest doing Thanksgiving at a restaurant and splitting the bill, or skip the holiday altogether and go on a vacation with just your immediate family.
These are easy adjustments you can absolutely make, but what you might find most useful is adjusting your definition of an invitation so that it’s no longer I will invite you, but you need to invite us back. Would it be nice to be invited? Yes. But rather than expecting something in return, try to see these “great” holidays that you feel your brother-in-law doesn’t deserve as a gift you’re all receiving. Consider the funny stories you’ll retell for years to come; the fond memories you’re creating; the opportunity for your kids to spend time with their uncle, their potential new aunt, and her son who’s the same age as yours.
Not all families have great holidays—someone’s a horrible complainer or makes offensive comments; another relative yells or gets out-of-control drunk. How lucky you are to invite relatives and spend an enjoyable time together—most people would take that over a return dinner invitation any day.
________________________________
This diatribe is one of the most insidious examples of casual misogyny; it's the kind where a woman feels a completely normal and natural response to behavior and she is counseled to blame herself for not CoMuNiCaTiNg.
The last paragraph tops off the mound of crap with 'It Could Be Worse.' This is how the worst male behavior gets excused away and the bar for acceptable behavior remains in hell.
Woman spends 25 years providing The Family Experience^TM to single male. Male chooses to ignore basics social decency and remains blameless.
Ugh notice how the “advice” is just how the woman needs to do all the mental and emotional labour of “communicating” and “assigning family members to make specific dishes or asking help for preparation and cleanup or ordering a pre-cooked meal” etc etc. Literally every holiday gathering I’ve been to (for Christian holidays like Thanksgiving and other religious celebrations) - it’s always the women slaving away in the kitchens and men relaxing on the couch.
Fuck the "Women just have to communicate more" tripe. Fuck everything about this culture that created that.
This is where the article lost me
"And perhaps when he had dinner near your home, he stayed for only one night because he has picked up on your resentment and worries that he’s a burden. "
And he never, not once in 25 years, offered to buy them breakfast? Lunch? Dinner? Gas station coffee before he leaves? Literally anything? Any DECENT person who suspects they might be a burden would try to remedy it. Wtf? A hotel room is a hundred dollars for one night, he couldn't feed them one time after all these years *as a thank you*?
Also, an anxious person would call weeks or months in advance, not the night before. The brother is a lazy mooch. Simple as. The author is a smarmy mooch, who grasps at straws to use anxiety and depression as an excuse to treat people like shit.
The BIL is a scrote, but also this "My husband said to call and ask me, because I would have to prepare the room." Why is he setting it up so that OP is the bad guy for saying no? He's your brother, YOU manage his visits, inviting or disinviting, and making up the room. How is that your wife's job?
The wife needs to plan a vacation and go out of town on Thanksgiving. Let the family fend for themselves while she relaxes on a beach somewhere drinking Thanksgiving margaritas. How much you wanna bet the men will just order in...
This article reiterated that even basic kindness to a man wastes time.
I hate this so much.
If men want to come along and benefit from women's emotional labour, then they should be willing to contribute.
Wow, what crap advice. Expect normal levels of consideration and reciprocity? Well, you should have *communicated* that!
I was with her during the unspoken contracts paragraph, because I believe that we do all have unwritten rules of social behaviour and expectations that others will follow those rules. It's the system of patriarchy that gives different rules to men and women though, so men might have an expectation of sex after paying for a meal, and women have an expectation of reciprocity when hosting. Since this was Ask A Therapist I will put on that hat again: in order to avoid keeping ourselves in a victim mindset, it can be helpful to explore our parts in interactions. This is not to victim blame or put all the emotional workload on us, but to empower. Life cannot be something that happens to us; part of levelling up is finding out where our agency went so that we have it in the future. I do not expect this to be a popular view: society sucks and yes it is unfair. I recognise that.
In this case the OP had an equal part in creating the pattern. She chose to invite the BiL because he didn't have parents or a wife. It seems she was happy with this arrangement until she perceives that he now has a family, and now the expectation is that they will host - but by they I am reading the new girlfriend. Otherwise BiL could have hosted before now!? There seems to be something here about families and thanksgiving.
The new girlfriend that was met just before the pandemic, so presumably did most of the dating during the pandemic. I wonder why there was little effort to spend time?
She wants to be the kinder person because she knows he struggle with anxiety. This comes across as seriously patronising. She has an idea in her head of who she is, (that will have been informed by the patriarchy oc). In my head I'm linking it with the invitations because he is single without family - did she pity the BiL for being single? It's conjecture, but something I would be finding out if she were my client.
I am also noting that she has to prepare the room: that's some very straightforward misogyny but the OP hasn't picked up on it.
OP needs an injection of radical feminism imo, but she is still responsible for her own choices and actions. She feels used, and BiL did use her, but she also colluded with it because of her social conditioning. She chose to invite him year on year in an unequal relationship, but she's only bothered now because of the steady girlfriend.
just throw the entire family away.
I hate Lori and her crap advice so much
My advice: Literally just say you’re too tired to make thanksgiving dinner, invite him to a restaurant on Black Friday, and get lunch together at a decently nice place halfway between you and him. If he’s 45 minutes away a 23 minute drive shouldn’t be bad. Men spend the night because they want to drink. They want to get plastered and have a house to sleep in. If meeting half way is too difficult then you have your answer. He just wanted a place to drink and then crash.