The scrotes are terrified of feeemales ruining their lives with a single false accusation, despite the fact that most worplaces prefer to sweep sexual harassment accusations under the rug.
This takes me back to my school days (long before "me too").
There had been a case of a male teacher sexually harassing female students (demanding sex in exchange for better grades etc.) at another school in the district and when it came out all schools implemented the rule that male teachers should not be alone with female students behind closed doors (e.g. leave the door open, meet in a more public place like the school library, have another student or teacher as a witness there and so on).
It was well meant and intended to protect us girls but there were so, so many male teachers that made us sound like the bad guys when they explained the new rules.
As if 13 year old girls were evil monsters just waiting to falsely accuse poor, innocent men of sexual harrassment for fun so they needed to stop being alone with us for THEIR own protection.
20
Unknown member
Mar 05
Replying to
"There had been a case of a male teacher sexually harassing female students (demanding sex in exchange for better grades etc.)"
This is the stuff of urban legend/horror movies. Truly terrible. 😑
How is it an urban legend? I don't think I know a single woman who can't tell stories about a male teacher who was creepy or inappropriate to female students. This happens every day and everywhere and way more often than false accusations against teachers.
If men are so concerned about false-allegations then maybe they should conduct themselves in ways that don’t create any inkling of harassment. And it’s not like these laws are being created out of thin air: theres legitimate reason for these laws and there’s a legitimate process to determine a proper outcome.
If a woman decided to be “evil” and falsely accuse a man of harassment just to get an advantage, she wouldn’t have enough proof. It’s not like medieval times where you scream “witch” and you get burned at the stake. This guy is overly paranoid, fear-mongering or admitting he’s a red flag (angry that HR now monitors men's conduct).
8
Unknown member
Mar 05
This isn't about allegations.
They want us to have to depend on them for resources.
And when women do depend on men, those same men accuse them of being golddiggers/leeches
Unknown member
Mar 06
Professional woman here! 99% of women I work with have neither the time, nor energy, nor clout to make up accusations, pursue action, and have something actually done about it. I'd say, in my company that has won multiple best workplace awards, that even for real but mild or occasional sexual harassment, the vast majority of women are so busy actually working that they are not going to take time out of their day to give themselves a name as a trouble maker. 99% of women don't care about 99% of men enough to destroy them.
I'd say the exception is a jilted lover, which would be much more likely. Solution, don't use your place of employment as a dating pool.
This is so stupid. Let's discount half the population because 1% might make trouble. Not the half of the population where 10% are actively harassing someone. SMDH.
Scrotes are weird. They whine about us feeemales being int he workplace, but if we become SAHM those same scrotes call us Gold-Diggers/Leeches for wanting a man with a liveable income.
4
Unknown member
Mar 05
So basically they can't take a joke nor do they have trust in a judicial system than benefits them? And the solution is not hiring women? As if a man could not send you to trial for some other reason? Yeah sure 👍
Yes to all of this. There isn’t a problem with Reddit posts so long as they give examples of how men can be. Sure, we shouldn’t bombard this platform with Reddit posts but some a necessary.
This takes me back to my school days (long before "me too").
There had been a case of a male teacher sexually harassing female students (demanding sex in exchange for better grades etc.) at another school in the district and when it came out all schools implemented the rule that male teachers should not be alone with female students behind closed doors (e.g. leave the door open, meet in a more public place like the school library, have another student or teacher as a witness there and so on).
It was well meant and intended to protect us girls but there were so, so many male teachers that made us sound like the bad guys when they explained the new rules.
As if 13 year old girls were evil monsters just waiting to falsely accuse poor, innocent men of sexual harrassment for fun so they needed to stop being alone with us for THEIR own protection.
If men are so concerned about false-allegations then maybe they should conduct themselves in ways that don’t create any inkling of harassment. And it’s not like these laws are being created out of thin air: theres legitimate reason for these laws and there’s a legitimate process to determine a proper outcome.
If a woman decided to be “evil” and falsely accuse a man of harassment just to get an advantage, she wouldn’t have enough proof. It’s not like medieval times where you scream “witch” and you get burned at the stake. This guy is overly paranoid, fear-mongering or admitting he’s a red flag (angry that HR now monitors men's conduct).
This isn't about allegations.
They want us to have to depend on them for resources.
Professional woman here! 99% of women I work with have neither the time, nor energy, nor clout to make up accusations, pursue action, and have something actually done about it. I'd say, in my company that has won multiple best workplace awards, that even for real but mild or occasional sexual harassment, the vast majority of women are so busy actually working that they are not going to take time out of their day to give themselves a name as a trouble maker. 99% of women don't care about 99% of men enough to destroy them.
I'd say the exception is a jilted lover, which would be much more likely. Solution, don't use your place of employment as a dating pool.
This is so stupid. Let's discount half the population because 1% might make trouble. Not the half of the population where 10% are actively harassing someone. SMDH.
Scrotes are weird. They whine about us feeemales being int he workplace, but if we become SAHM those same scrotes call us Gold-Diggers/Leeches for wanting a man with a liveable income.
So basically they can't take a joke nor do they have trust in a judicial system than benefits them? And the solution is not hiring women? As if a man could not send you to trial for some other reason? Yeah sure 👍
Honest question: Why do you care enough about what scrotes think to stay abreast of their scrotery and repost it here?